Monday, April 23, 2007

"This is a college Columbine."
-Virginia Tech Student, Fox Television News, April 16, 2007

It is urgent that you email or call your elected officials today.
They must hear that you want action to keep guns out of the wrong hands.

Please make as many of these phone calls as you can:

President George W. Bush
202-456-1414

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
202-225-0100

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
202-224-5556

The message for all three calls is simple:

It is much too easy for the wrong people to get deadly weapons in this country. It is time for you to take steps to end gun violence to prevent tragedies like the one at Virginia Tech.

If you can't make the calls, you can click here to send an email, which will go to the President, the Speaker, the Majority Leader, as well as your U.S. Senators and Representative. One click will email all six of them.

Monday, March 26, 2007

If Jesus knew that Judas was going to betray him, why did he keep him in the circle of his close companions until the end?
from the community of Taize 21-Mar-2007

Among the many disciples who followed him, Jesus designated twelve to be closest to him, to share and continue his mission. He took very seriously the formation of this group of twelve apostles, praying an entire night beforehand.

But at a certain moment, Jesus realized that one of the twelve, Judas, had changed his attitude. Jesus understood that Judas was becoming distant from him, and even saw that he was going to “hand him over,” as the gospels put it. According to John’s gospel, Jesus understood what was happening already in Galilee, long before the events in Jerusalem that would bring him to the cross (John 6:70-71). Why then did he not send Judas away? Why did he keep him close to him until the end?

One of the words used by Jesus to speak of the creation of the group of the twelve apostles gives us a clue. “Did not I choose you, the Twelve?” (John 6:70; see also 13:18.) The verb to choose is a key word in Bible history. God chose Abraham, and then chose Israel to become the chosen people. It is God’s choice or election that forms God’s people, the people of the covenant. What makes the covenant unbreakable is that God chooses to love Abraham and his descendants for ever. The apostle Paul would comment on this: “God’s gifts and call are irrevocable” (Romans 11:29).

Because Jesus chose the twelve just as God chose his people, he could not send Judas away even when he realized that he was going to betray him. He knew that he had to love him to the end, to show that God’s choice was irrevocable. The prophets, Hosea and Jeremiah in particular, spoke in the name of a God wounded and humiliated by the betrayals of his people, but who nevertheless never stopped loving them with eternity’s love. Jesus did not wish to do less, nor could he do so: humiliated by the treason of one of his closest companions, he kept on showing him his love. By lowering himself before his disciples to wash their feet, he made himself the servant of all, Judas included. And it was particularly with Judas that he shared a peace of bread, a fragment of burning love that the disciple took away with him into his night (John 13:21-30).

If he wanted to be faithful to his Father – to the God who chose Abraham and Israel, to the God of the prophets – Jesus could do nothing else but keep Judas close to him until the end. He loved Judas even when Judas was enshrouded by darkness. “The light shines in the darkness” (John 1:5). The gospel says that Jesus “was glorified” at the moment he gave his love to Judas, when he loved him without gaining anything by it and beyond all measure (John 13:31). In the darkest night of resentment and hatred, Jesus manifested the unbelievable radiance of God’s love.

Why are the gospels so discreet concerning Judas’ motives?

It is astonishing that the first Christians did not keep silent about the fact that one of the twelve apostles handed Jesus over to the hostile authorities. This fact casts doubt on the character of Jesus himself: did he make a mistake in choosing one of his companions? But it is equally astonishing that the gospels say almost nothing about the motives of Judas. Was he disappointed when he realized that Jesus was not a Messiah with a program of political liberation? Did he think he was acting in the best interests of his people by bringing Jesus’ career to an end? Some have supposed that he was motivated by the lure of a reward; others that he acted out of love, to help Jesus to give his life….

In the gospels there are only two indications concerning the reasons for what Judas did. One is the mention of the devil. “The devil placed in Judas’ heart the intention to hand him over” (John 13:2). But this only deepens the mystery. The devil, or Satan, is the one who opposes, criticizes or slanders. Jesus sensed the resentment that had come to birth in Judas’ heart and that was rooted there to the point of no return. But about why it existed, not a word, not even an allusion.

The other indication is the reference to the Holy Scriptures. Regarding Judas’ betrayal of him, Jesus said, “so that the words of Scripture will be fulfilled: The one who eats my bread turned his heel against me” (Psalm 41:9, quoted in John 13:18). It is important to understand correctly the meaning of this reference to the Scriptures in the gospels. They are not a kind of script where the role of each actor is written down in advance. Everyone who reads the Bible carefully knows well to what extent it offers choices and sets everyone before their responsibilities.

Quoting the verse of the psalm “The one who eats my bread turned his heel against me” (Psalm 41:10), Jesus does not mean to state that Judas could not have acted differently, but rather that God remains the principal actor in what is being played out. There is the drama of the betrayal, and at the same time God is the one at work. For if through Judas the Scriptures are being fulfilled, that means that, in a mysterious way, God’s intentions are being carried out. God is causing his words to come about (Isaiah 55:10-11). The reference to Scripture enables us to believe in God even during the night, even when what happens is incomprehensible.

If Judas’ resentment and hatred remain incomprehensible, Jesus’ love “to the very end” is still more beyond all understanding. The gospels are so discreet concerning Judas’ motives because they do not want to satisfy our curiosity, but rather to lead us to faith. They do not clarify the abyss of darkness of the drama of Judas; they reveal the unfathomable and incomprehensible depth of God’s love.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

The Ivy Bush: Christian Peace Witness includes reflections on the Christian Peace Witness for Iraq as well as a link to the video that is available online through the National Cathedral.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Nonviolence music video

... nonviolent actions in places including India, Nashville, Birmingham, Serbia, and others... we must meet physcial force with soul force... love and prayers, steve

Christian Peace Witness for Iraq

Video from Ken Butigan of Pace E Bene during civil disobedience in front of the White House.

Monday, March 19, 2007

Christian Peace Witness for Iraq
Friday, March 16, 2007

It was a long but joyous day on Friday with facilitating Nonviolence Direct Action trainings with Janet Chisholm and Kolya Braun-Greiner for those participating in the worship, as well as, for those discerning a call to civil disobedience. In the morning at St. Mark's Capitol Hill (rain); in the afternoon at Epiphany downtown (sleet); the National Cathedral (snow) where I was honored to have participated in the procession as the Episcopal Peace Fellowship representative and by the seating in the north transept immediately adjacent to the speaker's platform. To have an opportunity to be in the company of the speakers especially Celeste Zappala of Philadelphia (whose son, Sgt. Sherwood Baker, was killed in Iraq), Pastor Raphael G. Warnock (Senior Pastor of the Ebenezer Baptist Church, spiritual home of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.), and Jim Wallis (Call to Renewal and Sojourners) was moving and inspiring.

Janet and I, and others, were part of an Affinity Group that provided support for a friend from Nova Scotia who was arrested. Heather was one of 325 that offered themselves for civil disobedience by praying at the fence in front of the White House that evening.

All topped off with a gathering of the Episcopal Peace Fellowship at St. Alban's on Saturday.

For more coverage check out articles by the Washington Post,
United Press International, and the DC local Fox 5 news coverage (brief glimpse of me at 2:05)

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Priests to Purify Site After Bush Visit
Washington Post, AP
March 9, 2007

Mayan priests will purify a sacred archaeological site to eliminate "bad spirits" after President Bush visits next week, an official with close ties to the group said Thursday. "That a person like (Bush), with the persecution of our migrant brothers in the United States, with the wars he has provoked, is going to walk in our sacred lands, is an offense for the Mayan people and their culture," Juan Tiney, the director of a Mayan nongovernmental organization with close ties to Mayan religious and political leaders, said Thursday.

Read more at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030900076.html
Come no closer! Remove the sandals from your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground.

From Louie Crew's Do Justice site

Posted by permission

St. Thomas’ Parish, Washington, DCMarch 11, 2007Readings: Exodus 3:1-15. Psalm 63:1-8. Luke 13:1-9. 1 Cor 10:1-13

Come no closer! Remove the sandals from your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground.

I AM THAT I AM has sent me.

We stand on holy ground. This parish is a holy place.

I am a native of Alabama and was brought up in a devout Baptist family. As young teacher on my first job, I fled the Baptist church and was confirmed at St. Peters in Rome, [Georgia ] on October 29, 1961, and two years later I fled life behind the “Cotton Curtain” and moved to St. Andrew’s School in Middletown, Delaware. For me St. Andrew’s was a splendid closet in which I could hide from myself except in the far reaches of the night. I buried myself in the task that I loved best, teaching. For cabin fever, I would visit Octavio, a close classmate from Baylor, who worked at Walter Reed and lived on 17th Street, a minute’s walk from this parish. On many a visit I came here to St. Thomas’ to pray.

St. Thomas’ is holy ground for me. I rejoice that it is holy ground for you too, in all of your rich diversity.

Later I attended Eucharists many times while Integrity met here. Again and again I have reconnected here with many people important to my own spiritual journey. Yall have a splendid history of welcoming gay and lesbian people and everyone else as well.

This neighborhood is holy ground.

I discovered that long before I founded Integrity, or even imagined that the liberation to which God called Moses could prefigure the liberation to which God would call me, you, and so many others before us in this place.

The cry of the lesbians, gays, and transgendered has now come to me; I have also seen how the Church oppresses them. So come, I will send you to the Episcopal Church to bring my people, the Lesbians, gays and transgendered, out of their captivity." But then we said to God, "Who are we that we should go for you?" He said, "I will be with you; and this shall be the sign for you that it is I who sent you: when the people have come out of oppression, you shall worship God in this holy place."

When I first visited St. Thomas’, I was deeply closeted and told no one what I knew about my body chemistry or my heart. I vividly remember on one visit riding out to the National Cathedral on a bus on a very hot day in late spring. Many on the sidewalks had removed their shirts. The traffic was slow, and at one light the bus waited for several minutes. I stared uncontrollably at a man just standing by the bus no more than a foot from my window. I was glad that my friend Octavio was at my back and could not see my eyes. Then Octavio whispered to me, “Isn’t he gorgeous!?”

I turned in complete surprise. “You too?!” I asked. He smiled from ear to ear, his eyes sparkled, and he shook his head up and down.

Do you see the enormity of it! Octavio and I had been close friends for almost 10 years, yet so oppressive was the hetero dictatorship in our minds, that we dared not even share with each other the beautiful innocence of who we were.

That was 45 years ago, but almost any day now the legislature in Nigeria is expected to pass a law that not only will prohibit lesbian and gay marriage, but will also give harsh prison sentences to any gays who associate with each other in public (Look out a bus and whisper ’Isn’t he gorgeous!’ Hold hands? ) and will also punish any heterosexuals who advocate for such gay rights. Last week Time Magazine and The New York Times have joined many newspapers worldwide in condemning this proposal and in pointing a finger at Peter K. Akinola, Anglican Archbishop of Nigeria, who is one of the loudest in promoting the new law and in condemning the Episcopal Church.

The old English word hāl gives us three words in modern English: whole, hale [healthy] and holy. They still are one entity. You cannot be whole if you are not healthy. You cannot be holy if you cannot integrate body and soul, mind and spirit.

We stand on holy ground. We stand in a place safe enough to be whole, to be hale, to be holy.

I hope that you are having a good Lent. It is a penitential season. Throughout Lent we look closely at our sins and strive to repent. Rethink! Rethink! The Kingdom of God is very near you. Rethink! gets closer to the opportunity Lent provides than does Repent! Repent! too easily is received as “Feel guilty!“ God does not want us to grovel: God wants us to use our minds and when necessary, to change them.

I learned an important lesson from the Baptists about the dangers of reviewing my sins: namely, don‘t take someone else‘s word for what your sins are. When I arrived as a freshman at Baylor in 1954, I already knew that it was sinful to cuss, smoke, drink, chew, and beat your wife, but imagine my surprise when Texas Baptists talked about “the sin of mixed bathing”! Do men and women here in Texas actually take a bath together? I wondered in Alabama horror!

Baylor did not allow dances: instead, they renamed them as “functions.” Baylor did not allow fraternities and sororities, but instead, named them “social clubs.”The huge amount of time we consumed in sustaining these hypocrisies distracted us from looking at the sins of segregation and racism, of which we were all the silent, uncritical beneficiaries. Our missionaries to Africa could not even get their own graduates admitted to Baylor. It was not until after I graduated that a strong black tackle from the University of Texas scared the beJesus out of Baylor and prompted it to integrate.

Our beloved Presiding Bishop has invited us all to spend this Lent in a time of deep reflection about the place of the Episcopal Church in the Anglican Communion. I join her in that appeal, with a strong caveat that we not accept uncritically what the Lambeth Conference, the Windsor Report, and the Primates Meetings have told us to be our sins. Octavio and I were not sinning to look out the window of that bus and, like God, to call creation “good.” On the rooftop in Joppa, Peter heard correctly what he had not expected to hear, “Call nothing, [call no one] unclean that I have made!”

As many of you know, the primates of the 38 provinces of the Anglican Communion have issued an ultimatum that come September the bishops of the Episcopal Church must assure them that they will no longer consent to the consecration of lesbian or gay bishops and will also not allow the blessing of any more lesbian and gay unions.

Yet, the primates have no juridical authority to make such demands. The provinces of the Communion are autonomous -- interdependent we believe, but autonomous. The word autonomy loses all its meaning in the primates’ demands.

Suppose a president of the US (any one of them, this is not a partisan illustration) were to say to the Senate, “The House of Representatives is too cantankerous for me to bother with. Since both Houses must agree on any legislation before it becomes law, I will deal with them no longer, but only with you; and I expect you to vote down anything of which I disapprove.”

That’s the power play the primates are trying, to have only our bishops decide for the church, and unless enough leaders are vigilant, they just may get away with it. It doesn’t occur to most people in the pews that a bishop might be a sinner, that a bishop might grab power.

I believe that our sin is indeed driving this conflict -- not the sin being talked about, but the one we keep hidden: the sin of colonialism with its attendant racism is visiting itself upon us unto the third and fourth generation. Lesbians and gays are but scapegoats, a convenient issue that presents itself to those whom we have systemically devalued and abused for centuries flex their muscles as for the first time, their bishops have become a majority of the Anglican Communion.

The Anglican Communion is the accidental byproduct of British colonial rule, and in time, a byproduct of American colonialism as well. The New York Historical Society has for several years now mounted a series of exhibits about slavery in New York City. The “stock” at the original New York stock market was human stock: it was the slave market. Much of the wealth and power of this country, of this city, and of the Episcopal Church, derives from the fortunes made, directly and indirectly, by slavery and by the continued economic subjugation of descendents of slaves.

During this Lent, take a tour of neighborhoods you don’t normally visit in this marvelous capitol and ask yourself, “Of what I see here, how much is part of the continuing legacy of slavery?”

The cure for sin is not guilt -- the gift that keeps on giving -- but rethinking and right action.

Ask yourself what you can do to reverse the legacy of slavery? For example, you might organize a diocesan task on Reparations. You might ask John Johnson how you can become more involved in supporting the Millennium Development Goals (the MDGs). If you have not already done so, calculate .7% of your own annual income and send it to Episcopal Relief and Development earmarked for microeconomic projects in the world’s poorest nations, or earmarked for work with bringing black people back to New Orleans and the Gulf Coast.

My friend Alex Baumgarten, John’s colleague in our Washington Officeis has warned me that even in individual responses to MDGs we may make ourselves feel better and yet still miss out on an opportunity to have a bigger impact in eradicating economic injustice. .7% from every Episcopalian, if given, would be fine, but only a drop in the bucket to the amounts that Episcopalians can hope to raise for MDGs if we pressure our government to make a similar contributions to the economies of the poorest nations, whose resources corporate and individual American interests have too often exploited.

And hear the words of today’s Gospel writ in our own context:

"Do you think that because these poorest nations suffered in this way they were worse sinners than all us Americans? No, I tell you; but unless we rethink, we will all become as endangered as they are. Or those 2,600 who were killed when the World Trade Center fell on them or the 174 who were killed here in Washington--do you think that they were singled out as offenders? No, I tell you; but unless we rethink our foreign policy, unless we can see God’s image in every Muslim, in every dispossessed person, in every “enemy,” and love our enemies as we love ourselves, many more of us will perish just as they did."

Asked whether he believed in infant Baptism, Mark Twain replied: I not only believe in it: I have seen it happen.

When Ernest Clay and I married thirty-three years ago, I wrote my parents and told them about him. They wrote back saying they were happy for us but asked me not to bring him home to visit. “We are old,” they said, “and while most of our friends would remain our friends, we don’t want to put them to the test. We have to live here, and you don’t. But we hope you will continue to come to visit us on your own.”

I showed the letter to Ernest. He smiled when he had finished, but said nothing.

“Well, get your things. We’re driving to see them. It’s only 250 miles and we’ll be there before bed time.”

“Didn’t you read the letter?” he asked.

“They wrote that only because they don’t know you yet. When Dad sees how gentle you are, just like Mother, he will fall in love with you; and when Mother sees….”

“Louie, you’re going to see them, but I am not. I respect their wishes. They have a right to their quiet retirement.”

And you’re going to see them, because if you don’t, something very important in you will die. You are able to love me because they loved you. In that way, I get the best of both worlds: I have a good husband and I don’t have to spend time with my in-laws.”

“But….,”

“No but’s about it,” he said. I sulked, but I went.

After several visits, my father said, “Son, I don’t want to hurt you but I probably will because I don’t know how to talk about it except as a man of my generation, a son of one of the poorest counties in Alabama.

“I don’t understand how flesh of my flesh, blood of my blood could live with a black man as with an equal. At first I thought you might have chosen a black man so that you could feel superior, and I knew that could not be healthy for either of you. Then I feared you might think yourself as inferior because of being gay, and therefore chose a black man. Yet I have listened and listened and I have found no evidence that either has happened.

“And Son, something about you has changed. I loved you before you were ever born. I remember seeing you in the maternity ward with one foot out from under the cover the way I sleep, the way your grandfather slept, the way your great grandfather slept. I remember my joy the first time that I heard in your laugh your mother’s laugh. But son, up until now, something about you has always been incomplete. That’s not so anymore. I am not ready yet to meet Ernest, but you must go home and tell him that I love him, because he has given my son back to me whole.”

We often were amused that neither set of parents could recognize us when we answered the phone. Apparently we have the same answering style. Six years into our marriage, I answered and Dad said, “I’d like to speak to my son, please.”

“Dad,” I am your son, I laughed.

“No, Louie, I want to speak to my other son.”

This one’s for you, I whispered.

He told Ernest, “We are Christians, but we have not behaved like Christians. Will you forgive us, and will you and Louie come spend this weekend with us. We have invited all our friends to come and meet you.”

I believe in the Holy Spirit. I have seen the Holy Spirit happen.

As late as 1979 the General Convention held the view of gay people stated in Lambeth 1.10, in the Windsor Report and in the primates’ recent communique. If the Holy Spirit has needed almost 30 years to change our hearts, cannot we love those in the rest of the Communion enough for the Holy Spirit to work on their hearts?

I believe in the Holy Spirit. Amen.

--Posted by Ann to Walking With Integrity at 3/12/2007 04:49:00 PM

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Quiz: Which theologian are you?


I scored as Jürgen Moltmann. The problem of evil is central to your thought, and only a crucified God can show that God is not indifferent to human suffering. Christian discipleship means identifying with suffering but also anticipating the new creation of all things that God will bring about.

Jürgen Moltmann

73%

Charles Finney

73%

Anselm

67%

Martin Luther

67%

Augustine

67%

Friedrich Schleiermacher

67%

John Calvin

60%

Karl Barth

47%

Paul Tillich

47%

Jonathan Edwards

27%

Which theologian are you?
created with QuizFarm.com

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Ash Wednesday 2007
at Trinity Episcopal Church, Clanton, Alabama
by the Rev. Steve Shanks, Deacon
Isaiah 58:1-12 | Psalm 103 | 2 Corinthians 5:20b-6:10 | Matthew 6:1-6, 16-21

Beloved sisters and brothers, let us look to the Lord.
May only God’s word be spoken,
May God’s word be heard.
In the name of Jesus, I pray.
Amen.

Sometimes it seems best to simply read the texts slowly, clearly, and well, and then sit down. It is almost as if the read word speaks and comments clearly on itself, and a person like me who is called to offer a reflection on the readings must be careful not to detract from the written word. It seems that way to me for these passages appointed for Ash Wednesday.

A friend, Jim Sundholm, describes a time some years ago when a friend of his, a pastor in the American Baptist tradition, was reading the Isaiah 58 text in worship, that we heard just a few minutes ago, getting ready to preach from it. As Jim tells it, his friend got up to begin preaching, and said, “I can’t.” He paused. Again he said, “I can’t.” He then started to gently cry and said, “These words are beyond me, I can’t preach them.” The result that day, from the silence that followed, was that people spontaneously spoke out in similar confessions for about twenty-five minutes.

It is on this day that we face our frailty, our coming from and returning to dust, our sin. The Holy Scripture that we encounter calls us to be conformed to the values and character of God. For Isaiah, the call is to “do” the fast that the Lord chooses. For the psalmist, it is David’s desperate words about enduring the deep sadness of sins past that literally bring him, and us, to a position of humility and brokenness before God. For Paul in Corinth, it is engaging and demonstrating “the righteousness of God.” For Matthew it is recognizing that the “fast” is for you, it is about your internal life being conformed to the “mind” of God and “storing treasures in heaven.”

Isaiah in chapter 58 longs for a new day, one that is not formed or defined by the circumstances of injustice and oppression but rather a day that God chooses. A day of bonds being loosened and suffering being undone, a day of sharing our food with hungry people, offering shelter to those who are poor, and clothing those who are naked.

Kimberly Smith is a friend of mine whose heart burns for work in the international missions’ field. It is where her heart is broken. She and her organization, Make Way Partners, are engaged in work to prevent and combat human trafficking and modern day slavery which affects 30 million persons, mostly women and children. The work has taken this group to Portugal and Romania, and they are also on the ground in the south Sudan.

Today, at this moment, the challenge in the south Sudan is disease. Kimberly is there and in the midst of the ongoing meningitis outbreak. The disease is considered a fatal infection and is caused by bacteria that affect the thin lining of the brain and spinal cord, though if diagnosed and treated early it can be survivable. Those who do recover are very weak and face a variety of complications resulting from the disease, including brain damage and deafness. When a person survives meningitis, they are in great need of vitamins and minerals. The best way to get those into them is by using supplements since there is not a reliable, continual source of adequate food. Of course, it takes money to buy the supplements and arrange transportation to get it to where it’s needed.

The outbreak continues to spread throughout this area. It has been said that there is now written confirmation that 300,000 doses of meningitis vaccine are to arrive in the area on February 26th, more than a month after this current outbreak began. Hopefully, the aid promised by the government will come. Kimberly is today in the midst of working to organize an international medical team to bring skilled care givers and medicines to the region, but the costs and logistics are great.

There is a pressing need for simple medicines. A six-week old baby died just this past Monday due to not having anti-diarrhea meds. Kimberly reports that it is “frustrating” not to be able to get simple medicines. There are no local pharmacies where one can just go and pick up what you want. Meningitis can also cause pneumonia or other respiratory problems, and there is not an adequate supply of decongestants. I invite you to join me in remembering Kimberly and Make Way Partners in our prayers, as her team continues the work of raising up and delivering resources to people living in the dust in the south Sudan.

Isaiah knows the story of exile, as does Kimberly – the story of the scattered, starving refugee, those who are wandering, bearing great suffering. Isaiah cries out to God’s followers in their personal comfort, “Heed the unmet need about you, that’s what pleases God.” Yet, the cry goes on in every generation. The “fast” that Isaiah describes is what a broken, recovering community needed long ago; but the words are tragically fresh in our own day.

Matthew, in our gospel reading, reveals Jesus offering from the beatitudes – given from the mount in Matthew’s previous chapter and from level ground in Luke a couple of Sunday’s ago – a new, yet very old, word. Jesus’ call also seems similar to Joshua’s to “choose this day whom you will serve” (Joshua 24:15). I can choose the gods of this culture who entice me to pursue exterior comfort and appearance, or I can choose the Lord of inner confidence and certainty who treasures the connections that I make to the others around me.

When Matthew speaks (v. 21) about our heart and our treasure being located in the same place, it was helpful for me to reflect on the Hebrew concept of a single “heart-mind” where the heart is the center of our physical, mental, and spiritual life as human beings. This Hebrew sense of heart is not just about feelings, but is also linked with the activities of the mind and the will. The Hebrew sense of heart is about what is at the center of our moral and spiritual life. So, my treasure reflects not just how I feel about something, but it also how I “do” the fast that Isaiah describes, how I decide to choose to live out Christ’s call to me in every moment of my life.

For me, that includes a reordering in this new day that reflects the values of a new kingdom worth dying and rising for. This is a kingdom that not only recognizes that we both come from and return to dust, but a kingdom that invites us to reflect the new day of an old order, in both the fabric of our lives and the choices we make.

In Christ’s name, Amen.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

I was pleased to have an opportunity to provide a gospel reflection and deacon's witness talk at the Episcopal Church of the Epiphany in Leeds, Alabama this Sunday. I have many connections and friends to and through the parish. Below is the final draft of the my offering for this Sunday.

The Last Sunday after Epiphany 2007
at Epiphany in Leeds, Alabama
Exodus 34:29-35 | Psalm 99 | 2 Corinthians 3:12-4:2 | Luke 9:28-36, [37-43a]

Beloved sisters and brothers, let us look to the Lord.
May only God’s word be spoken,
May God’s word be heard.
In the name of Jesus, I pray.
Amen.

My sisters and brothers in Christ, allow me to say right now: It is good for us to be here in this holy place! I have been blessed to be with you at various times over the years, for some very happy occasions and for some tinged with the sadness of loss, but always in celebration, thanksgiving, and joy for the gift of God’s boundless grace. This parish of Epiphany has always seemed to me to be a place of tenacious hope, and for that I give thanks.

So, as we come to the end of the Epiphany season and start to look toward the beginning of Lent three days from now on Ash Wednesday, we find ourselves this morning in the midst of the scene of the Transfiguration.

I’ve read, that the Apache people of Arizona when they see the powerful lightning displays and hear the thunder echo from the canyons of the Superstition Mountains say, “That is the home of the thunder Gods.” The Kikuyu people of Kenya when they look at the majesty of Mount Kenya, alternately hidden and revealed by the clouds, say, “Ngai (god) lives there.” When the Hebrew people see Moses come down from Mount Sinai, his face shining with such a brilliance that he has to cover it to protect their eyes, say, “The Lord reveals himself there.” And when Peter and James and John come down from the mountain, after witnessing Jesus’ transfiguration and the appearance of Moses and Elijah, say, “God does spectacular things there!”

Mountains hold the mystery of the ages, the rock solid strength of the divine, the beauty of fellowship with God. They seem to have long held that kind of power for human beings, and I am no exception. I know that I’ve had the experience of going somewhere or doing something that lifts my soul to such a new height, that I’ve said, “I’ve had a mountaintop experience!” The psalmist even tells us to worship at God’s holy mountain. Mountains call us to worship God; who is Creator, Sustainer, and Redeemer of all that is.

Of course, my problem has always been that I want to stay on the mountaintop. There have been times when I’ve felt God’s presence so strongly that, like the disciples, all I want to do is to build a little house and stay there, soaking up all that divinity for myself. But, unfortunately, that’s not the way it works. As God told Abraham, “I am blessing you so that you will be a blessing,” and God has the same message for each one of us. Just think about what Moses had on his hands when he comes down from Sinai – a grumbling, mumbling people to be lead in desert wanderings. When Jesus and the disciples come down from the mountain; a great crowd of people meets them, wanting all kinds of blessings, including the healing of a child with a demon.

When the people of Kenya come down from their mountain there are more than one million children infected or affected by HIV/AIDS, seven hundred deaths per day from the disease, and massive poverty caused by fifty percent unemployment. It has been said that the people of Africa don’t struggle for quality of life. They struggle for survival, to keep themselves and their families alive for another day.

When we come down from our mountaintops, we also encounter the reality of the urgent needs of the people around us that are to be met. I found encouragement for myself, when the psalmist describes this experience as looking at God and responding with praise; because God loves justice, and establishes fairness and righteousness. Paul (in his second letter to the Corinthians) says that when we have seen the Lord’s glory on the mountaintop, we who are created in God’s image are truly transformed into that image. That is when we become people who not only seek righteousness for ourselves, but also strive for fairness and justice for all of God’s people.

One of the ways that we seek to strive for justice and meet the needs of those around us, here in the Diocese of Alabama, is through the network of Jubilee Ministries. Jubilee Ministry as it exists today was created by action of General Convention in 1982 and now encompasses over 700 different ministries throughout the Episcopal Church as well as 13 foreign countries.

My role in this ministry is as Diocesan Jubilee Officer, to provide support and encouragement for folks doing, or interested in doing, Jubilee Ministry in this diocese. But what does it mean to “do” Jubilee Ministry? Well, the mission of Jubilee Ministry is to make a direct and dynamic link between our theology and our ethics – in other words– it is where we connect the Talk of Our Faith and the Walk of Our Faith. As Christians we do this by:
  • First, calling the church to live out its prophetic role of empowering local people to “Do Justice, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With Their God.” (Micah 6:8)
  • and Secondly, by responding to the Gospel Imperative to “Feed the Hungry, Give Drink to the Thirsty, Welcome the Stranger, Clothe the Naked, Care for the Sick, and Visit the Imprisoned” (Matthew 25:35)
Perhaps, at its core, Jubilee Ministry is intended to help the church, and each one of us, focus attention on a specific question: How are we responding to the call of Jesus Christ who was born, who died, and who rose again two millennia ago?

Of course, the idea of Jubilee is established in the book of Leviticus: “You shall hallow the fiftieth year and you shall proclaim liberty throughout the land to all its inhabitants” – although there is no evidence that it actually took place then. But it can and is taking place now, in the church and in this diocese, this time is a “season of unfoldment in which God’s blessing, compassion, and justice are unleashed, not from some remote heaven but from within the human heart.”

What better description of the Christian journey can there be? Being stretched and cracked open by God’s own joy and desire for our full flourishing leads us to acknowledge that it is not only ourselves who need to flourish: we, as the body of Christ in the world, are called to be agents of healing for the entire earth.

The concept of Jubilee has its roots in the idea of Sabbath – a time of “re-creation, reordering, and release.” Former presiding bishop Frank Griswold once said that, “ in Jubilee, all creation is to be liberated for the sake of finding proper balance and relationship in union with God and one another. God's liberation unfolds as we cease to hold one another hostage through unyielding bias, prejudice, judgment, suspicion, fears, and forgiveness. ... Jubilee is fundamental to our life as a resurrection community.” Indeed, indeed…

So, how does Jubilee Ministry work? Why does it continue to flourish 25 years after the resolution establishing it at General Convention, and why has it now grown to be a vital part of the ministry of more than 1 in 10 parishes in the Episcopal Church?
Jubilee Ministry begins with an Episcopal congregation, an ecumenical cluster with Episcopal presence, or an agency with connections to the Episcopal Church being involved in ministry programs among, and with, poor and oppressed people wherever they are located. That’s the point of beginning.

A Jubilee Center then includes at least one or more of the following:
  • Advocacy – on behalf of others – by being the voice of those who have not yet dared to believe that their voice can literally change society and social structures.
  • Empowering volunteers and staff, as well as the population being served – for the good of others and our own life in community. By working together with others – by breathing in sync with the Spirit of God and of each other to bring about a new way of being in which we truly do live out our baptismal vows of respecting the dignity of every human being.
  • Evangelism – in our action, in our prayers, in a pastoral presence, in inviting others to share in our worship.
Jubilee Centers also covenant to actively participate in:
  • Reflecting theologically upon learnings in ministry,
  • Demonstrating the operation of programs as models to others, and to
  • Act as a resource center for other Jubilee Ministry Centers.
The kinds of ministries offered at Jubilee Centers include: camps, clothes, food, community services, children’s programs, youth programs, emergency services, health, HIV/AIDS, housing, shelters, immigration, jail or prison, homeless, substance abuse, credit unions – any ministry program among and with poor and oppressed people.

In the Diocese of Alabama, Jubilee Ministry Centers take the form of, and I’ll briefly describe just some of the ministries at each: Grace Episcopal Church in Woodlawn with 55th Place Thrift Store, Grace-by-Day, Community Kitchens; St. Timothy’s Episcopal Church in Athens providing a multi-cultural preschool with bilingual teachers and a drop-in pantry; The Jubilee Community Center in Montgomery providing after school programs, an entrepreneurial class, direct health services, job training, and vacation bible school; Christ Episcopal Church in Fairfield with CityWorks which is an interfaith Community Development Corporation providing affordable housing, in addition to, a literacy program, thrift store, prison ministry, and emergency services; and the newest member of Jubilee Ministry in the Diocese of Alabama, Good Samaritan Health Clinic in Cullman providing free primary health care serving low-income, uninsured, and under-insured residents of Cullman County. In the 4 years since opening its doors, the clinic has delivered $4.6 million in services to more than 7800 persons in the community. Also of note, services are being provided on budget's that last year totaled $200,000 and a total of in-kind contributions of $325,000. This year the clinic anticipates around 4,000 patient visits and will potentially provide approximately $4 million in services to our patients. They currently have three medical clinics per week and could use one more, two dental clinics per month, one eye disease and one hearing clinic per month. We also have twice monthly diabetes and nutrition classes and provide diabetic monitors, test strips, lancets and insulin syringes to our patients.

Perhaps you’re wanting to discern your place in this vineyard. I found a great resource in this important little book "What Can One Person Do?" In it, two accomplished economists, Sabina Alkire and Edmund Newell, who also happen to be Anglican clergy, have outlined seven simple steps that we people of faith can take to heal a broken world. They are (1) pray for the healing of the world, (2) be informed by study of the realities of global poverty, (3) give 7/10ths of 1% of our own incomes for international development, (4) connect on a personal level with those who are poor and marginalized, (5) get active in events addressing global poverty, (6) become vocal about these concerns, and (7) get political and advocate for the poor in our governmental processes. If you want to know more about how you can become engaged with this work, then getting a copy of this book can be a good place to start, and, of course, you can also talk to me or Mother Lynette or Deacon Clyde.

My Sisters and Brothers in Christ, like Moses and Jesus and the Kenyans, we go to the mountaintop to strengthen and renew ourselves, and to affirm our place in God’s heart. Then we, too, come back to the valley, to level ground, where there are people who are struggling for life, and where we are called to carry on God’s purpose. In this process, we will not only discover shalom, God’s Sabbath Peace¸ within our spirits, but we will also become bearers of that shalom to the earth and all her inhabitants in response to Jesus’ call to us: “You are gifted with my grace; you are the light of the world. Now go forth in my name, proclaim jubilee, and above all, surprise me.”

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Well, I'm happy to announce that, accompanied with lively debate both in the resolution committee and on the floor of convention, the living wage has been adopted as a standard for The Episocopal Church in the Diocese of Alabama. Please, keep our diocesan council in your prayers as they determine how to implement the living wage in our diocese. The final version of the resolution is as shown below.

A Resolution in Support of a Living Wage
Resolution # 4

Resolved, that the 176th Convention of the Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Alabama actively support the establishment of a living wage for all workers; and be it further

Resolved, that a living wage standard be defined as the Alabama poverty guideline for a family of four, to wit: 125% of the most recent federal poverty guideline for a family of four, as adjusted and published annually by the United States Department of Health and Human Services; and be it further

Resolved, that this Convention strongly urge those responsible for planning events hosted by the Diocese of Alabama to comply with this resolution and to commit the Diocese of Alabama at all levels, whenever possible, to obtain confirmation that local prevailing living wages are paid by hotels the Church uses; and be it further

Resolved, that the standard defined above shall be the goal of all parishes, worshipping communities and institutions of the Diocese as the minimum compensation of lay employees.

Adopted by the Diocesan Convention, February 16, 2007

Explanation

One of the central biblical imperatives is the call for us to uplift those living in poverty. Persistent and widespread poverty is for us a primary issue. In the Hebrew scriptures, the biblical prophet Isaiah offered us God’s vision of a good society. His words are as relevant today as they were 3,000 years ago, and show us the way forward. Isaiah envisions a society where:

"No more shall there be in it an infant that lives but a few days, or an old person who does not live a lifetime…They shall build houses and inhabit them: they shall plant vineyards and eat their fruit. They shall not build and another inhabit: they shall not plant and another eat; for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be, and my chosen will long enjoy the work of their hands. They shall not labor in vain, or bear their children for calamity; for they shall be offspring blessed by the Lord….” (Isaiah 65:20-25)

In the New Testament, Jesus defines his mission to be:

“to bring good news to the poor, to proclaim liberty to captives, new sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free” (Luke 4:18-19)

Jesus identifies so completely with poor and oppressed people that he told his followers that to meet or fail to meet the needs of the hungry, the stranger, the one without clothing, the sick, or the prisoner is to serve or not serve Jesus himself (Matthew 25).

This vision includes fair and good wages, housing and health, safety and security. In America, people who work should not be poor, but today many are. We must ensure that all people who are able to work have jobs where they do not labor in vain, but have access to good health care, decent housing, and are able to support their families. The future of our country depends upon strong and stable families that can successfully raise their children.

As encouraged by General Convention Resolutions GC2003-A130 and GC2006-D047, and in the midst of our prayerful conduct of the business of this Diocesan Convention, we call your attention to those who work in the hotels we occupy here; those workers who make the beds, vacuum the rooms, clean the toilets, carry our bags, and prepare and serve our food. We trust all will agree that in their work they deserve justice, respect, and a living wage that will support their families in our current economy. We therefore call your attention to the following facts, and invite your support of this resolution.

It is our understanding is that none of the hotels here in Tuscaloosa are either union hotels or providing a living wage. We deeply lament this. Some facts to consider:

In Alabama, 4.6 percent of hourly workers, or 53,000 people, earn the minimum wage of $5.15 or less, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The average hourly wage in Alabama for a Food Preparation & Service-Related worker is $7.04. (Source: The Living Wage Calculator at http://www.livingwage.geog.psu.edu/)

Working full time (2080 hours per year), a Food Preparation & Service-Related worker above would earn $14,643/year. That falls well short of what it would take to provide even a minimum acceptable income - given today's soaring housing, health, and transportation costs. It is also reported that in 1999 (the last year for which figures are available) about 24% of persons at work in non-agriculture industries were employed less than 35 hours per week.
(Source: http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/658_persons_at_work_by_hours_worked.html)

This proposed resolution provides a definition and formula (125% of the federal poverty guideline for a family of four as published by the United States Department of Health and Human Services http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/) for determining the current poverty guideline, and is also intended as a minimum guideline, on an annual basis, for compensation of lay employees of parishes, worshipping communities, and other institutions. The living wage is the minimum compensation to be paid to those employees.

For the year 2006, the federal poverty guideline is $20,000 annually for a family of four. The living wage guideline in this proposed resolution is 125% of that number, or $25,000. This equals $12.00/hour for a full-time worker.

Adopted by the Diocesan Convention, February 16, 2007

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Sample Bible Study for Living Wage Discussion

Read Matthew 20:1-16 (The Laborers in the Vineyard) aloud.

‘For the kingdom of heaven is like a landowner who went out early in the morning to hire laborers for his vineyard. After agreeing with the laborers for the usual daily wage, he sent them into his vineyard. When he went out about nine o’clock, he saw others standing idle in the market place; and he said to them, “You also go into the vineyard, and I will pay you whatever is right.” So they went. When he went out again about noon and about three o’clock, he did the same. And about five o’clock he went out and found others standing around; and he said to them, “Why are you standing here idle all day?” They said to him, “Because no one has hired us.” He said to them, “You also go into the vineyard.” When evening came, the owner of the vineyard said to his manager, “Call the laborers and give them their pay, beginning with the last and then going to the first.” When those hired about five o’clock came, each of them received the usual daily wage. Now when the first came, they thought they would receive more; but each of them also received the usual daily wage. And when they received it, they grumbled against the landowner, saying, “These last worked only one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the day and the scorching heat.” But he replied to one of them, “Friend, I am doing you no wrong; did you not agree with me for the usual daily wage? Take what belongs to you and go; I choose to give to this last the same as I give to you. Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to me? Or are you envious because I am generous?” So the last will be first, and the first will be last.’

Discuss it as a group:
What is your first response? What is this parable about?

Two scenarios are described below. The instructor/leader may form the class into two groups that report back to the main group, or address both scenarios in the main group:

The field: “The workers gathered in a parking lot hours before dawn. As with every day, they hoped the buses would come soon, and that the drivers would choose them to go into the field that day and work. The buses arrived, and one by one, workers were picked to go to the tomato fields. They picked tomatoes, gently tossing them into 32-lb. buckets and taking the buckets to large trucks. They received a token for each bucket. At the end of the day, their backs were sore and their hands were discolored with pesticides. Some of the people never got picked to ride a bus to work. Sometimes, a bus came back if there was more work to do, but it was unlikely. At the end of the day, those who had worked all day might take home $30. Those who had not worked went home with nothing.”

This is a present day description of the plight of many farm workers. It is uncannily similar to the story described in the parable.

The store: “The workers got to work fifteen minutes early, as always. They lifted boxes and stocked shelves for seven and a half hours, with two fifteen-minute breaks. One coworker had to miss work that day because she took her child to see a doctor. She did not have health insurance, because her employer limited her hours to 35 per week, less than “full-time,” and therefore exempt from the health insurance requirement. She had to pay for the doctor visit and her prescription out-of-pocket on top of missing a day’s wages – sick days are not in the hourly workers’ plans, either. After earning $7 per hour, the workers clocked out and took the bus to their various homes.”

In each small group, discuss the short scenario. Imagine being in the position of the worker in the field or the store. What would it feel like to take home such low wages each day? Do some math together and calculate the monthly salary. Would you be able to pay your rent/mortgage? Would you be able to buy groceries? Pay for your electricity and other utilities? Pay for car, insurance, and gas? Do you have children or other dependents to feed?

Most Americans agree that someone who works a full day should not be in poverty. What kind of wages do you think a person should get paid and why?

In the large discussion group, ask each group to briefly describe their discussion. What happened in the scenario they read, and what were the sentiments/thoughts of the group?

Ask someone else to read the parable again out loud.

Discuss:

  • What do you notice this time?
  • How do the present-day scenarios lend a new perspective to this parable?
  • The vineyard owner in the parable says he will pay, “Whatever is right.” What is “right,” in today’s society? Minimum wage is currently $5.15 per hour. Is that “right?” Why or why not?
  • Often, the authors of parables want the reader to imagine themselves in the role of the main character. Here, the writer is describing the day of the vineyard owner, the person with the power to affect wages. In what ways do we have the power to affect wages (lobbying congress, purchasing goods or services only from those who pay fairly, paying our own employees – including church employees—fairly, etc.)?

Offer the good news, that Christ came “to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free, to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor." (See Luke 4:16-19) One way Christ does this is through us, the church.

Closing prayer:

Holy God,
You bring good news to the poor.
Help us to be the bearers of that good news.
Help us to be the subject of that good news.
Help us learn how to make that good news happen.

You proclaim release to those who are captive.
Help us proclaim your will to the ones who may affect change.
Help us release those who are held captive by poverty.
Help us learn how to break those chains.

You bring recover of sight to the blind.
Help us learn what to look for, and
Help us to see it.
Help us teach others to see.

That we may speak your truth
That we may follow your way
That we may bring your light
And create your justice, your peace.

In the name of Jesus Christ, we pray, AMEN.

adapted from Jeannie M. Hunter, Emory University, 2005.

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Sermon for the Nineteenth Sunday after Pentecost 2006, Proper 23B
St. Andrew's Episcopal Church, Montevallo, Alabama
Psalm 90:12-17 Amos 5:6-7,10-15 Hebrews 4:12-16 Mark 10:17-31

Beloved sisters and brothers, let us look to the Lord. May only God’s word be spoken, May God’s word be heard. In the name of Jesus, I pray. Amen.

This morning, I’d like to explore this image of “the journey” in Mark’s gospel. This theme of following Jesus.

For me, this is the meaning of the question “Why do you call me good?” that is addressed to the person whom Matthew calls only “the young man”, but whom for both Mark and Luke, seems to be a somewhat older person. Jesus begins his response by referring to God, whose goodness is at the root of everything. Then Jesus summarizes the first part of the commandments and includes an important addition that is found only in Mark, “you shall not defraud.” The word translated as “defraud” in this verse is from the Greek àpostéresiz which literally means, “withholding what is due.” So, Jesus is telling the rich man, “you shall not withhold from persons that which they are due.” The phrase seems to summarize the list just mentioned “You shall not murder; You shall not commit adultery; You shall not steal; You shall not bear false witness.” Oh, and let’s not forget to “Honor your father and mother.” The rich man responds by saying simply, without any arrogance, that he has kept all these precepts. This was the conviction of the well-educated; that it is possible to observe the law in its entirety.

However, following Jesus is much more demanding. Lovingly, Jesus invites the man to become one of his followers. In addition to giving up his wealth, the man must give it to the poor and the needy. Jesus is letting the man know, not to withhold what is due. If the man will do this it will enable him to follow Jesus. It is not enough to respect justice in our personal attitudes; we have to go to the root of evil, to the basis of injustice: the desire to accumulate wealth. But we know how this story goes; giving up his possessions proves to be too difficult for this person. Like many of us, he prefers to live his faith resigned to comfortable mediocrity. He does believe, but not that much. We human beings can profess our faith in God, although we refuse to put God’s will into practice. Jesus takes advantage of this opportunity to make some things very clear to his disciples; attachment to money, and to the power it provides, is a major obstacle to entering the kingdom. The “eye of the needle” comparison that follows is pretty rigorous. I’ve read and heard some who have tried to lessen the impact of this parable by focusing on the likelihood that in the city there was a small door called “the eye of the needle” and for that reason, all a camel had to do was to bend over to be able to go through.

The disciples, on the other hand, understand the message perfectly well. This whole thing seems next to impossible for them. There would have been no mistaking that “to go through the eye of a needle” means placing all our trust in God and not in the material wealth of the culture. It is not easy either personally or as church to accept this challenge and, like the disciples, with would-be realism, we wonder, “Then, who can be saved?” We claim that money gives us security and that it enables us to be “effective.” Jesus reminds us that our ability to believe in God alone is a grace.

So, on our broader journey together through the Holy Scriptures this morning we hear the prophet Amos thunder against the unjust practices of his society: “you turn justice to bitterness…because you trample on the poor and take from the levies of grain.” He tells us in no uncertain terms to hate evil, love good, and establish justice. The prophet warns that those who oppress the poor will ultimately reap disastrous consequences; that life lies in pursuing good.
The author of the letter to the Hebrews offers us encouragement; aware that we are weak, aware that there are hard times when we will be tested and that we are indeed in need of God's grace.

And then, in the gospel of Mark we find ourselves face-to-face with “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of heaven!” and then Jesus reverses the social order; in his Kingdom the first are last, the last first, and wealth is an impediment. The rich man goes away empty, while the disciples, who have left everything, gain everything.

These are challenging passages, and they are as relevant today as when they were written. How do – how can – those of us who live in this culture, and comparatively with such wealth, respond to these passages?

We know that poverty, injustice, and oppression abound in our world. Some of the current facts regarding World Hunger and Poverty include:

  • 852 million people across the world are hungry, up 10 million more people than a year ago. Hungry not for just an hour, not for just a day, but always and in every moment
  • And today, more than 16,000 children will die from hunger-related causes – one child every five seconds
  • And this year, another 5 million people will become infected with HIV and more than 3 million people will die of AIDS
  • And this from last week, on the ground, in Haiti, a country of 8 million people of whom 2 million live in Port-au-Prince where the average income is $1.00 a day and gasoline is $6.00 a gallon because it is 100% imported to one location. At the six churches and five schools visited, only one has water and lights from a generator that also pumps the water. The other five churches and four schools have no electricity and no water, and the only nutrition sites are at the churches. The Diocese of Alabama is planning to fund a well at one of the churches from our MDG funds, beginning in about two weeks. It is what the gospel for this Sunday tells us to do – to share justly what we have. The people of Haiti shared with us what they have – coconut water so that we could have pure water to drink one day up the mountains. A bag of coconuts is worth a week’s wages at market. And theirs is the kingdom of God.

When poverty kills millions of people, when the rules and practices of international trade are so unfair, it is time to stand up against the crushing realities of poverty. It is time to make life-changing choices and put our faith into action.

Yes, it is a lot to ask, to not withhold what is due. In this journey, we share in the disciples' confusion and dismay. But the truth is that this dilemma is the center of the Christian life. Will we trust the security of the culture, or choose to risk accepting God's covenant? With the disciples we find ourselves asking, "How is this possible?"

In this important little book "What Can One Person Do?" two accomplished economists, Sabina Alkire and Edmund Newell, who also happen to be Anglican clergy, have outlined seven simple steps that we people of faith can take to heal a broken world. They are (1) pray for the healing of the world, (2) be informed by study of the realities of global poverty, (3) give 7/10ths of 1% of our own incomes for international development, (4) connect on a personal level with those who are poor and marginalized, (5) get active in events addressing global poverty, (6) become vocal about these concerns, and (7) get political and advocate for the poor in our governmental processes. If you want to know more about how you can become engaged with this work, then getting a copy of this book can be a good place to start, and you can also either talk to me or Father Tuohy, or to Judy Quick who is our parish coordinator for Episcopal Relief & Development.

So, as Rowan Williams tells us, we can give thanks today for truths we did not want to know; for the Savior who saves by telling us how the world is, not by pretending all is well – because if we cut ourselves off from the reality of the suffering and excluded child, we are refusing to learn some aspect of the life we need to receive and understand and love, for our own souls’ sake. We are given a chance to see, to learn the habits of attention.

In the simplest terms, by the gift of Christ’s truth, we are given some of the strength we need for love. The child we leave “on the edge”, unheard or unnoticed, is, if only we knew, God’s gift for our growth, as we can be God’s gift for theirs.

Sunday, April 23, 2006

Sermon for the Second Sunday of Easter (B)
at Trinity Episcopal Church, Clanton, Alabama
Acts 4:32-35 Psalm 133 1 John 1:1-2:2 John 20:19-31

I am a real fan of our reading from Acts for this Sunday; it's one of my favorite passages in the New Testament. And perhaps it betrays that my mama was an English teacher, that my appreciation for this particular passage in Acts is in large part a declaration of my affection for a well-chosen conjunction, and my abiding resentment of those who left that crucial conjunction out of the translation of Acts 4 that we heard earlier this morning.

It's true, and I’m sure that you'll share my indignation when I tell you that Acts chapter 4, verse 34 is probably missing that conjunction in your bibles.

Or maybe you won't initially, I understand.

But what if I told you that the missing conjunction was "FOR"? OK, maybe no recipe for instant empathy with me there. But let me put it another way.

Acts, like Luke (which makes sense given that it's a two-volume work by a single author), makes a very important point about something core to the order of the world as it is – namely money; and about that part of ourselves that is both the most sane and most imaginative (these things go together, I believe) and that anticipates the coming of God's kingdom. And Acts 4 puts it together for us very neatly – which seems clear to me once we've put back the missing conjunction that was part of the original Greek. Let me read it again, and if you would look at your copy of the Acts 4 reading you’ll be able to see where the change occurs.

Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. With great power the apostles gave their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all, FOR (onde gar = for-not) there was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.

In the translation that we have in our lectionary reading today, Acts 4 sounds too much like an idealized story of how things were in the "good old days"; not a recipe, but rather a status claim. "Things were great in the early days of the church … we had unity, and testified with power … oh, and there weren't any poor people then."

Of course, that wasn’t the case. Luke-Acts repeatedly makes a direct causal connection between community of goods and unity of spirit. In other words, all of this "we are one in the Spirit, we are one in the Lord" stuff of youth group songbooks of the 1970's, and all too much rhetoric elsewhere, is just so much theological muzak if we don't live out what that crucial missing (in most translations) conjunction tells us, which is that the power of the apostles' testimony, the experience of grace in community, even the unity of the Body of Christ has a direct relationship with the extent to which all of those of us who call ourselves Christians share what we have with those who don't have it.

The whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of anything, but they had all things in common. And in great power the apostles gave their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus and great grace was upon them all, FOR there was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold, laying it at the feet of the apostles, and it was distributed to any as had need.

Oh, for the recovery of that lost and much-needed "FOR" and the resulting understanding in both the church's imagination and the popular imagination! And what an experience of God's power and of the reconciliation for which the world was made and for which it and its Creator longs, that we could have IF (to use another important conjunction) we had not a needy person among us.

People say that could be, you know – not crazy dreamers like me, but people with degrees in important and useful fields like economics at big and well-respected institutions like Harvard and Oxford. We really could have not a needy person among us – not through some imposition of gated so-called "community" shutting out the poor – but by seeing that every person on earth has a chance, has clean water and some education; a chance of surviving to build communities and families of love.

Our own Bishop Andrus serves on the board of Episcopalians for Global Reconciliation. He lives out, and has asked us to join him in, a vision for ending extreme poverty in our lifetimes. It wouldn't take us all selling all we had, but sharing a mere 7/10ths of one percent of what we have. Less than one percent of our treasure shared, and we'd know to the core of our being that about which the psalmist sang and many dreamers dream:

How good it is when sisters and brothers in the human family live together in unity! For there the LORD has ordained the blessing: life forevermore.

We miss that aspect of Jesus' message, of the prophets' message, of God's own heart all too often. There seem to be many Christians who proclaim a Jesus who is all about taking people from earth up into disembodied heavens, like some kind of transporter from Star Trek. The theology of the Gospel According to John is sometimes caricatured along those lines too: Jesus as some kind of E.T., come down from the heavens, recognized as the force of love by only a few and even then misunderstood by those closest to him, dying solely as a means to more efficiently "phone home" and ascend into the heavens, leaving humans amazed or ashamed, but in one way or another, behind in all cases. Left gaping at stars they can't reach or seeing the world that gave them birth as just a pit of cruelty and death.

That's not Jesus' message, in John's or any canonical gospel. And as much as John emphasizes Jesus' crucifixion as being "lifted up", John drums into our head perhaps more than any other gospel where Jesus' heart is, FOR even as Jesus is "lifted up," even after Jesus, having been faithful to God's call, is raised and qualified to ascend to the heavens to the fellowship of the Trinity whose love is so great that a universe was made and is being redeemed and sustained, Jesus keeps coming back to those he loves.

And Jesus is engaged with the world. He is the Word who was with God in the very beginning, and whose love was present in the birth of creation. He is the peasant child who knew and loved the earth he walked and all those who walk with him. He is the naked, vulnerable and tortured man nailed to immovable wood and still moved with compassion for his torturers. He has died, and he is risen, and yet he comes again, to touch doubters and healers, soldiers and peasants, persecutors and apostles – who are sometimes the same people, after all… especially after Jesus' touch.

Jesus comes to the women at his tomb and his followers huddled in fear. He comes to those who confess him and those who grieve him, miss him, or doubt him. He comes to those who love him and those who hate him. Jesus comes and he comes and he comes to this world because he is not done with this world, no matter how many times people of this world say they are done with him, or with the way of peace and compassion he walked and walks. Jesus is not done with any of us, and never will be, until we know in our heart of hearts, experience in the deepest part of ourselves, and are bursting alongside the whole of creation to share the wealth of love and generosity for which we and the world are made.

We may grow weary, but Jesus will not grow weary of us. We may close our eyes and forget to dream, but Jesus is alive, and still dreams with and for as well as through and among us. God is redeeming the world God made and loves, and we may as well let ourselves get accustomed to this love that is the most basic force of the universe. The Christ has died, the Christ has risen, and the Christ WILL come again. Let us rejoice now with all whom Christ loves in celebration and anticipation!

The Lord is risen! Alleluia – and thanks be to God!

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Reflections on SOA/WHINSEC Rally and Vigil
1st Sunday of Advent, 2005

Dear Friends,

I've collected some thoughts, reflections, and impressions regarding this year's rally and vigil, and have included them in the following. Since I'm writing this at the beginning of our season of Advent, I thought it might be helpful to begin with a quote from William Stringfellow for some context.

In the First Advent, Christ the Lord comes into the World; in the next Advent, Christ the Lord comes as Judge of the world and of all the world's thrones and pretenders, sovereignties and dominions, principalities and authorities, presidencies and regimes, in vindication of his lordship and the reign of the Word of God in history. This is the truth, which the world hates, which biblical people (repentant people) bear and by which they live as the church in the world in the time between the two Advents. -- from "Advent as a Penitential Season", William Stringfellow (1929-1985)

I was blessed this year to again co-facilitate nonviolence direct action trainings for persons that represented a broadening demographic. I was also asked to be present to several of the persons discerning a call to active nonviolence and civil disobedience.

Media coverage and photos are available at: http://www.soaw.org/new/article.php?id=1223.

While the weekend's events to close the SOA/WHINSEC were getting started and with thousands converging in Columbus, Georgia, we had also received sad news from our friends in the Colombian Peace Community San José de Apartadó. On Thursday, November 17th, 2005, troops commanded by General Luis Alfonso Zapata Uribe attacked and killed Arlen Salas David, a leader of the peace community. It was only last February when eight members of the San José de Apartadó Peace Community in Urab´, Colombia -- including three young children -- were brutally massacred. Witnesses identified the killers as members of the Colombian military, and peace community members saw the army's 17th and 11th Brigades in the area around the time of the murders. In the face of this, families, children, and friends continue in faithful, peaceful, and nonviolent witness in this community of peace.

The SAN JOSE DE APARTADO PEACE COMMUNITY wrote on November 18 2005:

We make an appeal for national and international support, so that our extermination can be stopped; so that the inhabitants of the whole region of Arenas Altas are not forced to become internally displaced, which the Army has told us is their objective. The serious and committed work that ARLEN was carrying out will guide us. Pain barely lets us talk but we will continue to cry 'Dignity' out loud, like he taught us to do during his daily chores and his commitment to the community. His two small children will continue to walk besides us, building a different tomorrow in which there will be respect for life. ARLEN, OUR TEARS ACCOMPANY THIS HORROR BUT YOU ARE WITH US, GIVING US LIFE, THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP, FOR YOUR COMMITMENT. SOMEDAY HISTORY WILL JUDGE THOSE WHO MURDERED YOU.

To read the entire message from the San José de Apartadó community in Spanish you can go to: http://www.soaw.org/new/article.php?id=1226.

Information about the February massacre in San José de Apartadó is available at: http://www.soaw.org/new/article.php?id=1024

On Saturday, survivors of torture shared some of the their stories with us. Carlos Mauricio, a former El Salvador professor who was abducted and tortured by Salvadoran death squads 22 years ago, remembers not only his own broken bones but also the suffering of others. "What has been very difficult to deal with is the memories of other people being tortured." In 1999, Mauricio and two other torture victims, Neris Gonzalez, a church worker, and Juan Ramagoza Arce, a doctor, brought a civil suit against two Salvadoran generals, former Defense Minister Jose Guillermo Garcia and former National Guard Director-General Carlos Eugenio Vides Casanova. Both graduated from the School of the Americas. In July 2002, the Salvadoran generals were found guilty by a West Palm Beach court under the 1991 Torture Victim Protection Act, which states that "victims did not need to prove the military leaders knew they were being tortured, only that Garcia and Vides allowed a culture in which soldiers could commit human rights abuses against civilians with impunity." The two were ordered to pay their victims $54.6 million in reparations. Last March, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta overturned the Florida jury's verdict, ruling that the case failed to meet the 10-year statute of limitations rule. The case is still under consideration. Reflecting upon his abduction, Mauricio says, "The recurring nightmare for me isn't the moment of being tortured. The recurring nightmare has been the moment of being abducted. It was very, very violent, and they came to my classroom." His sacred place. As you might imagine, it can be difficult for survivors of torture because of the flashbacks that result from being in such close proximity to the place where their torturers, and for many also the murderers of their friends and other family members, learned the means and methods of torture and oppression that they have used. For more on their work log on to http://www.tassc.org/ , and click on "Search Bills and Resolutions." Select the option to search by bill number, and in the "Enter Search" box, enter the bill number for HR 1217. By clicking on the "Bill Summary and Status" link, you can access other useful information about the bill.

On Sunday, more than 19,000 persons were reported to be present for the vigil which began as we honored with our witness and called to memory the hundreds of thousands who have suffered and died in a Litany in Honor of the Victims to which we responsively sang, "No Mas! No More!". The silent funeral procession followed the litany. As the name of persons who have died as an alleged result of SOA/WHINSEC activities was sung, those persons moving in procession raised their crosses, icons, or hands and sang responsively, "Presente!"

Elizabeth "Betita" Martinez of Z Magazine has described her experience of the vigil and funeral procession as being one of the many thousands of people who, "listened as the names of 767 Salvadorans massacred at a single village rang out, one after the other, on a sunny afternoon last November in Columbus, Georgia. After each name we shouted PRESENTE! -- a salute to the dead.

"Cristina Guevara, 25 years old - Presente!José Francisco Reyes Luna, age 5 - Presente!Vicenta Marquez, 80, widow - Presente!Elena Rodríguez, 16 - Presente!José Romero, 6 months, son of Lucas Guevara and Rufina Romero - Presente!Orbelina Marquez, age 45, seamstress - Presente!Mirna Chicas, 10 - Presente!Fabi´n Luna, 20, day laborer - Presente!Domingo Claros, woodcutter, and 15 family members down to an 8-month old daughter - PRESENTE!
On and on went the list of Salvadorans murdered in and around El Mozote by a U.S.- trained battalion during Ronald Reagan's "war on communism." Of the victims, 45 percent were children under 12. And when those names finally ended, a group of Colombians arrived at the stage with a 3-page list of recent victims in their country. The atrocities born at Fort Benning's School of the Americas have never stopped.

"It was impossible not to weep during the two-hour naming. It was also impossible to watch the memorial procession marching by the stage at the same time, a human river stretching too far to be seen.

"Too many of us do not know the long range reach and effects of the School of the Americas (aka School of Assassins) whose purpose is so simple: to guarantee Latin America's political, economic, and social conditions never threaten U.S. hegemony. No price for that is too high, it seems.

"The names read did not include the 2 million Colombians killed or displaced by civilian-targeted warfare under the direction of SOA graduates. Or the hundreds of thousands of indigenous people murdered, tortured and disappeared in Guatemala when SOA graduate Ríos Montt ruled the country. Or the 30,000 killed or disappeared in Argentina when SOA graduate Leopoldo Galtieri headed the military. Or the ten SOA alumni indicted with Pinochet in Chile. Or the murders in Bolivia, Honduras, Mexico and Haiti...

"We may have heard of the 6 Jesuit priests, their housekeeper and her daughter murdered in 1989, but without knowing that 19 of the 26 Salvadoran soldiers cited for it were SOA alumni. Or that two of the three cited for assassinating Archbishop Oscar Romero as he conducted mass and that three of the five soldiers cited for the killing of four U.S. churchwomen were also SOA graduates from El Salvador. Or that the slaughter continues today, no matter claims by SOA brass that the worst abuse has ended. No matter that this terrorist training camp was so gently renamed the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC) three years ago."

A part of my lectio divina while I as at the SOA/WHINSEC rally and vigil this year was "Jesus Christ: Model of the Nonviolent Human Being" by Fr. John Dear and published by the Fellowship of Reconciliation. In it, he suggests that the God of nonviolence tells us that cultural violence is not our only alternative. "The only vocation to which a Christian is called," observed William Stringfellow, "is to be a mature human being." Fr. Dear suggests that an anthropology of nonviolence asks, in light of today's global violence, "What does it mean to be a human being?" It seems that a human being is called to be a person of nonviolence, a peace maker in a world of war, a seeker of justice in a world of injustice, a channel of compassion in a world of apathy. It also seems that a mature human being is one who worships the God of nonviolence by living at peace with every other human being. So, what does it mean to be alive in this age that we live in? In light of the peacemaking Jesus, Fr. Dear suggests that an anthropology of nonviolence would seem to answer that a full human life worships the God of life and gives over its own life so that all humanity may live in peace with justice, without the threat of violence. To be human is to be nonviolent.

The commitment to change among those who nonviolently and actively work on behalf of persons who have suffered torture, murder, and oppression as a result of the work of the SOA/WHINSEC is political, spiritual, and very real. This work may also have a positive influence on the future of the Americas and its people. As followers of the Way of Jesus Christ, I believe that we must denounce these social injustices and try to faithfully live our Christian commitment and prayer by working to forge Shalom and establish peace and justice. The church must be a sign of the kingdom within human history. I agree with others who have suggested that our preaching, liturgy, and teaching should take into account the social and community dimension of Christianity, and form men and women committed to peace: los pueblos unidos, jam´s vencidos. ¡Adelante siempre!

"Love your enemies,
do good to those who hate you,
blessed are the peacemakers,
put down the sword."